Appendix I » History » Version 10
jdurr, 09/23/2020 11:32 AM
1 | 2 | jdurr | h1. Appendix I |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | jdurr | |
3 | List of products generated by the CDCB. |
||
4 | |||
5 | 7 | krandall | |
6 | |*DHI summaries*|*Evaluation summaries*|*Genetic evaluations ([G]PTA + [G]Rel)*|*Genomic analyses(a)*| |
||
7 | 1 | jdurr | | DHI Participation|Genetic sire evaluation summary|NM$, FM$, CM$ and GM$|BBR| |
8 | 10 | jdurr | | State and national standardized lactation averages|Changes from previous run|Milk, Fat (lbs), Fat Percentage, Protein (lbs), Protein Percentage|Genomic predictions for crossbreds| |
9 | 1 | jdurr | | DHI herd production averages by herd size, breed and test-plan|Percentile Tables for NM$, FM$, and CM$|SCS|Recessive haplotypes| |
10 | 7 | krandall | | SCC averages by state, herd size and year|Elite cow statistics|Productive Life, Livability|Parentage verification| |
11 | 10 | jdurr | | DRPC activity summary|Breed names, base adjustment parameters, and heterosis|DPR, CCR, HCR, Gestation Length, Early first calving|Parentage discovery| |
12 | 8 | jdurr | | Reasons for termination by breed and parity|Genetic and phenotypic trends|Calving ease, Stillbirth|Genomic inbreeding| |
13 | | Reproductive traits averages by breed and year|SNP marker effects Manhattan plots|Type traits (conventional type evaluations for HOL are calculated by HAUSA)|Genomic relationships| |
||
14 | 7 | krandall | | |Comparison of genomic and traditional evaluations|SCR| | |
15 | | |Average evaluations by country of most daughters|Milking speed (BSW)| | |
||
16 | 8 | jdurr | | |Source of top 100 bulls on each country's scale|Best prediction of lactation yield| | |
17 | 10 | jdurr | | |Inbreeding trends|Health traits (DA, Ketosis, Mastitis, Metritis, Hypocalcemia, Retained placenta)| | |
18 | 7 | krandall | |
19 | |||
20 | (a)Imputed genotypes, allele frequencies, lists of SNPs in predictive sets and SNP prediction equations are intermediate products and are restricted to CDCB staff and AGIL-USDA researchers. |